There's a new budget GPU in town, the 3GB version of the GeForce GTX 1050, and boy is that this one a ordinary animal.

Recently we checked out the catastrophe this is the DDR4 version of the GT 1030, a horribly deceptive product that shouldn’t exist. We expect that to go down as one of the worst photos card launched in records.

Read More : >We don't anticipate this GTX 1050 3GB model to be nowhere close to as awful, in truth it won't also be horrific at all. However we bring up the GT 1030 to reminiscence because it's an needless unusual release and a chunk deceptive.

Prior to May 2018 there has been handiest one model of the GTX 1050 (code-named GP107-300) and it came with a 2GB reminiscence buffer. That's the equal GPU we've got seen on retail in view that October 2016 while we first tested it. However, on May Nvidia quietly up to date the GTX 1050 web page on their internet site to include a 3GB version that appeared to slot-in among the prevailing 2GB 1050 and the 4GB 1050 Ti, even though it’s a bit extra complicated than that.

The 3GB 1050 isn’t merely a 1050 with an extra gigabyte of VRAM. Instead it functions 768 CUDA cores but a Chip: smaller ninety six-bit memory bus and this is because of a change inside the backend configuration. Ok, so it is a GTX 1050 Ti with a gigabyte much less VRAM... Nope no longer that either.

In this desk you could see that while it has the identical CUDA core count number as the 1050 Ti it has 25% much less ROPs and meaning it has 25% much less than the authentic 1050 as well. Although you get the identical 7 Gbps GDDR5 memory, the memory bus is now simply ninety six-bit due to the reduction in ROPs which sees one of the 4 reminiscence controllers disabled. The result is just 84 GB/s of memory bandwidth, down from the 112 GB/s of the 2GB 1050 and 4GB 1050 Ti.

Additionally, this also way the L2 cache capability has been decreased down from 1MB to 768KB. Nvidia is clocking the cores better to compensate, however we expect that during some instances this received’t assist conquer the 25% reduction in reminiscence bandwidth, ROPs and cache.

So why is Nvidia selling a 3GB version of the GTX 1050 that probable won’t carry out like a 1050 with an extra gigabyte of VRAM?

Given the specifications we anticipate that for the maximum part it's going to sit among the 2GB 1050 and 1050 Ti, however there will absolute confidence be times wherein it’s simply slower than even the 2GB 1050. The most likely clarification is they had a stockpile of faulty GP107 dies that had one defective memory controller, for example. So Nvidia is salvaging the ones components by means of creating the 3GB 1050. It’s a bit odd to peer this so late within the product cycle however that’s no longer definitely the difficulty right here. What we see as an problem all over again is presenting multiple GPU configurations beneath the same name.

At the very least the 3GB model ought to had been called the 1050 SE, or LE, or anything aside from simply the 1050 3GB. It’s no longer in contrast to the 3GB and 6GB GTX 1060 situatiChip: AMDnd I’m awaiting to discover a comparable end result.

On hand for testing we've got the EVGA GeForce GTX 1050 SC Gaming. It comes with a small five% manufacturing facility overclock and proper now it's promoting for $one hundred forty which is basically what you could expect to pay for a 2GB version, making it round $30 less expensive than the GTX 1050 Ti. Our take a look at includes 23 video games, all of that have been tested at 1080p using various exceptional settings. However we're only going to speak about the highlights for 8 of the games after which bounce into our performance breakdown, which appears on the entire picture.

Our test bed build round Corsair's Crystal Series 570X changed into used. Inside we have a i7 -8700K clocked at 5 GHz with 32GB of DDR4-3200 reminiscence. We recognize this hardware configuration is overkill for these GPUs, but as traditional the concept is to take away any capacity machine bottleneck that would masks GPU overall performance. Onto the good things…

Benchmarks

Starting with the Battlefield 1 outcomes we see that the 3GB 1050 is nine% faster than the 2GB versiAMD Ryzennd sixteen% slower than the 1050 Ti. So that’s a high-quality result for the 3GB versifive 2500Us it's miles indeed faster than the authentic 1050 in this title. That stated it's far still quite a chunk slower than the 1050 Ti because of the downgrades I spoke of in advance.

Despite the high quality performance just seen, when testing with Wreckfest we find a completely distinctive photograph. Here the 3GB 1050 changed into truely slower than the unique 1050, thirteen% slower in reality and that intended it was 21% slower than the 1050 Ti. A troubling result there so permit’s circulate on.

Now when checking out with Rainbow Six Siege we see that the 3GB 1050 is 22% faster than the authentic 2GB model and simply 11% slower than the 1050 Ti. So like Battlefield 1 this is a very good result for the brand new 3GB version.

Interestingly we see an eleven% reduction in overall performance for the 3GB 1050 whilst playing ARMA three and as a result the 1% low result dropped under 60 fps. So another terrible result for the new 3GB model.

Finally we’re going to study the Warhammer Vermintide 2 consequences and right here we see a tie among the 2GB and 3GB variations of the 1050, making them thirteen% slower than the 1050 Ti.

On the subsequent page we will be searching at electricity consumpti5 2400Gnd the entire game benchmark results throughout 23 games to get a fuller picture in addition to our analysis of in which the 3GB GeForce GTX 1050 stands.