Read More : >When we currently up to date our Best CPUs characteristic, we noticed that get admission to to less costly first-gen Ryzen processors remains an attractive alternative for plenty. The Ryzen 7 1700 is a standout choice in particular as this 8-middle/16-thread element is selling for $a hundred and sixty, which means you may both buy the R7 1700 or the Rfive 2600. So nowadays we’ve were given a classic face to face CPU comparison for you.

For those shopping for new our best desire in this rate range is the five 2600X 2600X. It's currently a mere $20 more than the non-X model and is derived with a higher cooler and greater competitive clock speeds out of the field. In this state of affairs we experience the small rate top rate is really worth it. However, quite some of you had been thinking if the Ryzen 7 1700 turned into well worth buying over the 2600X. Naturally you get two extra cores, however the drawback is which you leave out out on those Zen+ optimizations and that they do make the second-gen components a bit greater responsive, a piece snappier if you will.

For productivity workloads that require many cores the R7 1700 is a greater obvious desire. The clock velocity disadvantage and better memory latency are usually conquer with the aid of the 33% increase in cores. That stated, in case your workload doesn’t require eight cores then the 2600X might be faster.

Then for the ones of you who prioritize gaming, which one is higher? Based on our day-one coverage, you’d must go with the 2600X, however a 12 months later has anything modified? Are today’s video games greater disturbing?

For all trying out we used the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti to help minimize GPU bottlenecks, however earlier than some of you frown approximately us the usage of such an extreme GPU, please notice all testing takes place at 1080p, 1440p and 4K. So the 4K ultra outcomes may be similar to 1080p with a mid-range pics card for instance. Moreover, the ones the use of lower satisfactory settings will see better frame charges with a lesser images card.

Since the integrated memory controller of the 2nd-gen Ryzen processors is tons progressed, we didn’t bog down the 2600X when it came to memory. Instead we paired it with a 16GB DDR4-3400 CL16 package. The R7 1700 turned into constrained to 16GB DDR4-2933 reminiscence with CL15 timings.

Both CPUs had been examined on the Gigabyte X470 Aorus Gaming 7 WiFi with the standard box coolers. We're no longer looking into overclocking (we blanketed that at launch) and the point of interest is on gaming performance even though we ended up trying out a few application workloads to paint a fuller picture at the stop.

Benchmarks

First up we've got Vermintide 2 and this is a good example of a name that isn’t in particular CPU intensive, at least no longer when evaluating 6 and 8-middle processors. We’re seeing equal performance out of the 1700 and 2600X notwithstanding being what appears to be CPU sure at 1080p with the RTX 2080 Ti. Not a lot to file right here, so let’s move on to Assassin's Creed: Odyssey.

The consequences here are a touch more exciting. The Ryzen 7 1700 is visible proscribing performance at 1080p, quite closely in fact whilst searching on the 1% low end result. The 2600X presented a 26% performance boost, preserving frame fees above 60 fps at all times.

Moving to 1440p and now we’re turning into GPU sure but then again the common body charge become still 10% greater when the usage of the 2600X. Once we hit 4K we’re mostly GPU confined but even here the 2600X’s advanced latency and assist for faster reminiscence accounted for a small distinction.

Although Fortnite isn’t particularly CPU demanding whilst discussing 12 and sixteen-thread processors, we see quite a sizeable overall performance uplift with the 2600X. The clock pace gain and stepped forward reminiscence performance is gambling a key position right here.

The 2600X became up to twenty% faster at 1080p and provided up to 17% more overall performance at 1440p. By the time we hit 4K the margin is decreased to nothing and by means of this factor we're seeing the identical overall performance no matter which CPU is used.

Apex Legends sees as much as a 10% performance benefit going the manner of the 2600X at 1080p. That margin is decreased to 7% at 1440p after which absolutely removed at 4K. Given the non-GPU sure results are throughout one hundred forty fps, the difference doesn’t rely an awful lot here.

In Resident Evil 2 the 2600X eked out a few greater frames at 1080p, imparting round nine% greater overall performance. That margin become halved at 1440p after which completely removed at 4K. So relying at the high-quality putting and resolution you may see as much as a 10% difference, however most probable you'll see little to no distinction on this identify.

Next up we've Just Cause 4 and this time we see up to a 15% overall performance gain with the 2600X. Even at 1440p the 2600X become 8% faster. Not a big margin by way of any stretch of the imagination however still a decent overall performance boost at this GPU-stressful resolution.

Hitman 2 is constantly a chunk of an ordinary name, right here we see the R7 1700 growing a bottleneck at the three resolutions as it restrained the RTX 2080 Ti to seventy two fps. However we noticed a consistent drop in 1% low overall performance because the resolution was improved and the 4K result is quite uncommon. The 2600X allowed for up to a ten% performance raise and presented more constant 1% low overall performance.

Project Cars 2 sees the 2600X turning in up to ten% more performance at 1080p and 12% extra at 1440p. The 2600X appears to be GPU limited at 1080p and 1440p, at the same time as this is only true for the R7 1700 at 1080p. By the time we hit 4K both CPUs are heavily GPU confined, so overall performance is plenty the equal.

The 2600X changed into up to 15% faster in Rainbow Six Siege and even at 1440p provided barely greater overall performance, though with each CPUs able to over a hundred and twenty fps always you need to marvel how a great deal that margin matters.

We have to mention we were amazed to look the 2600X delivering up to 20% extra frames in Battlefield V, even at 1080p. Basically the Ryzen 7 1700 became restricting the RTX 2080 Ti to round one hundred fps in our check, creating a bottleneck at 1080p that ended in similar performance visible at 1440p. At 1440p we are still commonly GPU confined and that is of direction turns into even greater proper at 4K.

Strange Brigade isn't always CPU stressful in any respect and it’s an awesome example of ways things will look a Box typical gaming title, or while GPU certain.

Star Wars Battlefront II is each stressful at the CPU and GPU, however while you’ve got 12 or greater threads to play with the CPU side of things, it is less of an difficulty. Both CPUs performed similarly in this game.

Finally we have The Division 2 and we see comparable performance the usage of both CPU...

Wrap Up: Evenly Matched

It’s truthful to say that overall the 2600X Review 2600X and Ryzen 7 1700 are very comparable in terms of gaming overall performance. When we noticed a difference, the 2600X become main the way in every unmarried example, even though typically the delta was restrained to a five to ten% margin. We experience for maximum gamers that difference won't be realized.

Still if you handiest intend to play video games then the 2600X is the higher CPU. You’ll gain more from the decrease latency and higher clocked memory now, whereas the extra cores of the R7 1700 may by no means prove useful for the lifestyles of the CPU. However, as we referred to earlier, if you may positioned the ones greater cores to paintings on productiveness apps, then the Ryzen 7 1700 ought to prove extra attractive... How much more appealing? It’s now not vastly faster and will require a few tinkering to definitely pull notably beforehand of a stock 2600X.

For the ones of you no longer interested in overclocking, the Ryzen 7 1700 is simply 4% quicker out of the box in Blender. So for content material creators the 2600X might sincerely show to be a better preference as its clock speed benefit and lower latency memory will make it higher for modifying. Even whilst taking up rendering tasks the R7 1700 changed into just 6% quicker, as visible in Corona, so it’s now not like the 2600X is getting blown out of the water, despite having only six cores.

If you require similarly evidence right here are a few Cinebench R15 effects. The 1700 is best 3% quicker while comparing multi-threaded overall performance. However it’s critical to note that for unmarried-threaded or maybe lightly threaded workloads the 1700 could be around 15% slower, and this became visible in our gaming benchmarks.

You probably observed the Ryzen 7 1800X outcomes inside the previous couple of utility graphs and it turned into up to 20% quicker than the 2600X. That is manageable with the R7 1700 through overclocking. The Ryzen 7 1700 has pretty a chunk of overclocking headroom until you get a dud chip, but primarily based on our purchases -- and we've bought quite a few of these -- your possibilities of having a dud are narrow.

If you’re not inquisitive about overclocking and you've your preference of either CPU at the identical charge, we’d get the DeskMini 2600X each time. The Zen+ refinements had been no longer game-changing but the latency enhancements are there and standard the 2600X is the marginally quicker CPU. Frankly although, you won’t move incorrect both manner while the opportunity is getting an eight-core sixteen-thread CPU for $160.

With Zen 2 just around the nook it’s a difficult desire for the ones wanting to upgrade now. Do you keep out a little longer or snap up a dirt reasonably-priced first or 2nd-gen Ryzen processor now? We leave that choice up to you.

  • AMD Ryzen 2600X on Amazon, Newegg
  • five 2500U 7 1700 on Amazon, Newegg
  • 5 1600 7 2700X on Amazon, Newegg
  • 1600 (B350) 5 2600 on Amazon, Newegg
  • AMD B450 motherboards on Amazon
  • AMD X470 motherboards on Amazon