The XG350R-C is ViewSonic's today's ultrawide screen aimed solely at the gaming marketplace. A 35-inch 3440 x 1440 MVA show with a maximum refresh fee of 100 Hz, an 1800R curvature and FreeSync. It retails for $seven hundred, so it’s a touch on the premium facet, however we’ll see how it performs and whether it stacks up to other famous monitors in this category.

ViewSonic has covered numerous gamer functions a Boxddition to the specifications we just noted, including RGB lighting fixtures, some thing ViewSonic calls 'ClearMotion' (backlight strobing), and black stabilization. This is blended with low enter lag and fundamental aid for HDR10 content.

Read More : >

Out of the field we observed the XG350R-C is sort of a corpulent monitor, now not simply in phrases of bulk however also the bezels. A lot of video display units are shifting to slimmer designs, but it appears ViewSonic hasn’t got the message as it’s larger than even the Acer Predator X34 which changed into launched lower back in 2015.

The base is pretty big, too, even though we know some human beings decide upon these designs to the wide three-pronged stands however this issue simply takes up a whole lot of room a Chip: desk. The top news is this adjustable stand does aid swivel, tilt and peak adjustability. On extra price range services it’s rare to get height adjustment, so this is a welcome inclusion Chip: AMDn otherwise sturdy creation.

On the rear we’re stepping into gamer territory with RGB LED lights and a few 'gamer' styles. This isn’t as egregious as, say, an Asus ROG layout but it additionally lacks that sleek and diffused aesthetic that I personally revel in. There’s also LED lighting inside the base of the stand which shines toward the the front, and a headphone rest that pops out of the stand at the again.

The build satisfactory is rather unimpressive. Not bad, however the heavy use of stock wellknown black plastic doesn’t supply the XG350R-C a top rate appearance. When you combine this with the overall chunkiness you’d be greater inclined to indicate it turned into a budget display, in preference to some thing priced near $seven-hundred.

The array of ports is good, two HDMI 2.0, a DisplayPort enter, a basic three-port USB hub and a three.5mm audio output jack. You do get internal speakers for simple audio output.

The on-screen display is each appropriate and bad. We like the inclusion of a directional toggle, however ViewSonic has still somehow made it hard to navigate with the aid of constantly switching which buttons carry out which actions depending at the place of the menu you're in. A nitpick but we discovered it stressful sufficient to say. The menu’s coloration scheme is difficult to study on sure backgrounds, too, so I frequently found myself wanting to position a white window behind the menu just so I could see what’s taking place.

We did discover a few beneficial functions in right here. ClearMotion, ViewSonic’s logo name for backlight strobing or black frame insertion, provides additional clarity to motion in a few gaming environments. I’m in my opinion now not a fan as the backlight brightness drops and you could’t use it along FreeSync, however some humans love this sort of feature. There’s additionally a wide style of recreation modes, shade settings, and so on. I was surprised at the lack of cheat crosshairs even though given how ubiquitous that feature is amongst different brands.

One thing we need to mention is our unit shipped with two useless pixels within the a ways bottom right corner, in near proximity to every different. This does show up every now and then, it’s not virtually some thing every body will revel in, we were simply unfortunate with our unit.

Performance

Let’s talk refresh fee earlier than we circulate into different overall performance metrics. This is a 3440 x 1440 panel at a hundred Hz which we assume nonetheless qualifies as high refresh nowadays, no matter the supply of 144 or even 200 Hz at this decision. It’s a smoother enjoy than 60 Hz, the step up to 144 Hz is sizeable however we sense for a variety of gamers, mainly people who don’t have a excessive-end GPU, this refresh rate may be very nice.

The decision is 1440p-class that is perfect for gaming and productiveness responsibilities, and the 21:9 factor ratio provides that little bit of immersion for your gameplay. As a person that games AMD Ryzenn ultrawide I virtually propose it. ViewSonic is providing adaptive sync with low framerate repayment, that is a should. It works perfectly on AMD and Nvidia GPUs and genuinely no problems with flickering.

1440p ultrawide excessive refresh video display units have matured loads in recent years to the point where even VA offerings have decent refresh rates, in assessment to a few non-ultrawide displays with comparable specifications. Using the Ultra Fast overdrive setting, we recorded a grey to gray common response time of 5.13ms, which as you can see is one of the quickest VA reaction time averages we’ve measured. Typically for a 16:9 display those panels take a seat round 7-9ms but for some reason those ultrawides are simply a lot quicker.

The XG350R-C is round 0.7ms faster than the 34-inch VA equivalent of this panel you spot in price range offerings like Kogan’s 34-inch ultrawide. The distinction being 34-inch panels are manufactured with the aid of Samsung, whereas AU Optronics makes the 35-inch fashions. This ViewSonic monitor is also a touch faster than the pleasant LG IPS panels ought to offer with this resolution, as visible within the LG 34GK950F and its 6.1ms transition time. Still, there’s a chunk of a cluster in that five-6ms bracket with now not a great deal difference among each option.

In terms of input lag, any other respectable end result for the XG350R-C with under 4ms of latency, that is inside the regular bracket of gaming video display units. The LG 34GK950F is the fastest ultrawide we’ve examined at 2.4ms of latency however we’re speaking approximately a minor 1ms distinction here.

Brightness is right, 330 nits out of the field goes to be too bright for most customers, and with none real HDR assist there’s not anything to be worried about. The evaluation ratio, however, is a weak spot for AU Optronics’ ultrawide panel: it sits at simply 1900:1 for the XG350R-C, as compared to round 3000:1 for video display units that use Samsung's.

The XG350R-C is a popular gamut monitor that makes a speciality of sRGB, in my testing it exceeds the sRGB spectrum barely but no longer via sufficient to be DCI-P3 compliant. Not that this matters, sRGB is maximum crucial for PC utilization nowadays whether that’s gaming or software use.

Color Reproduction

This monitor is fantastically decent in phrases of its calibration. A white point of 6554K is brilliant, and if it weren’t for a piece of inaccuracy in the darker location of the gamma curve, we’d be searching at a sub 2.0 deltaE common. When viewing saturation overall performance, we do hit that sub-2.zero deltaE common that is excellent and helped hugely with the aid of the correct white point. And then we also get a higher than common result when viewing ColorChecker numbers.

Considering most gaming-grade monitors ship with very little calibration to talk of, we are thrilled to look close to-accurate results from the ViewSonic XG350R-C out of the container. With a few small tweaks and adjustments to the shade controls in the on-display screen show I became able to tighten matters up in addition, with sub-2.0 deltaE averages across the board, a totally strong displaying here.

And of direction we can go one step further with a full calibration, the effects of which you can see beneath:

OSD calibration results ( 1 - 2 - three ) outcomes ( 1 - 2 - 3 )

While this screen promises strong color results, outstanding response times and suitable input lag, there may be one component that definitely shall we it down: panel coating. This is some thing we usually don't talk as it’s a non-difficulty, however with the XG350R-C we at once spotted something bizarre about the manner it shows text.

It’s a diffused impact, however this monitor seems to have a bit of ‘smudginess’ to it. Text lacks the sharpness and readability of different 3440 x 1440 video display units we’ve reviewed these days, and whilst viewing the display thru a magnifying glass I put this right down to some thing peculiar about the coating that’s diffusing the mild barely, creating the smudge problem.

Click for the entire decision images that depict the smudgy effect extra virtually

The diffused loss of sharpness is sort of like the reveal is jogging at a subnative decision, besides it’s running as meant. It’s a unusual one due to the fact the display screen coating isn’t some thing we would have issues with. But on this problem on my own we’d discover it tough to recommend this display when similar alternatives exist that deliver extra readability.

Moving directly to uniformity, once more those are right outcomes for an ultrawide. We’re getting traditional falloff alongside the outer edges but the primary region in all fairness accurate, absolutely extra so than a few curved ultrawides we’ve examined.

Wrap Up

With all the testing performed, the information Box +nd the comparisons made, we assume the ViewSonic XG350R-C is one of the uncommon video display units that we can’t advise. We determined 4 key issues: The smudgy display coating is an extraordinary trouble however a complete dealbreaker that reduces the clarity of an otherwise decent excessive decision panel. The layout is bulky and not very appealing. The on-display screen menu is defective in its navigatifive 2500Und shade scheme which makes it difficult to apply. And the comparison ratio is lower than equal monitors that choose Samsung’s VA panel over AU Optronics'.

There are several positives here, too. Response time and enter lag performance is first rate. Not outstandingly better than equal monitors, however nonetheless superb. Out of the box colour performance is better than we anticipated and better than average. And it does include capabilities like a peak adjustable stand, backlight strobing modes, and RGB lighting.

But unfortunately, those cons are compounded by means of a rate tag that’s no longer aggressive. At $700, a 3440 x 1440 ultrawide wishes to be providing a better refresh fee than 100 Hz to justify its rate tag. For just $100 greater you could clutch the Acer Predator X34P or LG 34GK950G, each of which can be all round better video display units with a a hundred and twenty Hz refresh charge and G-Sync.

Then extra less costly video display units including the $450 Viotek GN34C or MSI MAG341CQ don’t provide features like a height adjustable stand or backlight strobing, but there's no manner the ones capabilities are really worth spending a further $250 on. To make subjects worse, these inexpensive options deliver higher photograph high-quality. Response time and enter lag results are similar, however the contrast from Samsung’s less expensive VA panel is better, and also you don’t get the bizarre coating trouble that this ViewSonic monitor has.

Bottom line, the ViewSonic XG350R-C is a tough skip with too many flaws for our liking and higher alternatives to be had. Viewsonic produces one of our favorite productivity video display units (take a look at out the ViewSonic ColorPro 32" VP3268-4K), and the facts suggests appropriate colour reproducti5 2400Gnd specifications for game enthusiasts in this curved XG350R-C, but they may ought to tweak the formulation further earlier than they could compete with the pinnacle gaming contenders.

  • ViewSonic XG350R-C 35" (1440p 100 Hz) on Amazon
  • MSI Optix MAG341CQ (1440p one hundred Hz) on Amazon
  • LG 32GK650F 32" (1440p 144Hz) on Amazon, Newegg
  • Acer Nitro XV273K 27" (4k 120Hz) on Amazon, Newegg
  • Asus MG279Q 27" (1440p 144Hz) on Amazon
  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on Amazon, Newegg
  • GeForce RTX 2080 on Amazon, Newegg
  • Radeon RX 580 on Amazon, Newegg