A struggle that desires no in addition introduction, we're pitting the new Ryzen nine 3900X head to head towards the Core i9-9900K in 36 video games. There’s hundreds of consequences to move over and this article is purely centered on PC gaming overall performance. For greater context at the abilities of the cutting-edge Ryzen collection, take a look at out our day-one opinions of the 3900X, 3700X and the mainstream five 2600X 3600. We've also ran an IPC clock-for-clock take a look at evaluating in opposition to Intel CPUs and a cooling assessment, the usage of the stock Wraith Prism cooler vs. A liquid cooler at the Ryzen nine.

Read More :

Before we jump to the benchmarks, some compulsory take a look at notes: the 3900X has been examined at the Gigabyte X570 Aorus Xtreme the use of the cutting-edge BIOS revisia Chip:nd there are test configurations. The first which we’re calling "inventory" is the 3900X with the Wraith Spire RGB container cooler and nothing more than the XMP profile loaded in the BIOS the usage of DDR4-3200 CL14 reminiscence. Then we have an overclocked configuration the use of DDR4-3600 CL16 reminiscence, the Corsair Hydro H115i all-in-one liquid cooler with PBO+AutoOC enabled.

There’s also stock and overclocked configurations for the Core i9-9900K, although they're each technically overclocked as we aren’t power limiting the Intel CPU. This is better explained as out of the box after which guide overclocked. The stock or out of the container configuration makes use of DDR4-3200 CL14 memory with the Corsair H115i at the Gigabyte Z390 Ultra. Then for the overclocked configuration the memory has been upgraded to DDR4-3600 CL16 with an all-middle clock of 5 GHz.

All checking out passed off at 1080p using an MSI RTX 2080 Ti pictures card to take away GPU bottlenecks. We’ll observe the margins for all 36 video games in the direction of the stop of the evaluate, but first we'll go over and briefly talk the findings for about a dozen of the titles tested.

Benchmarks

We tested the brand new model of World War Z which brings about some of fixes and performance upgrades. Both stock and overclocked the 9900K turned into ~2% quicker than the 3900X that is a negligible difference. Needless to mention, the gaming enjoy was indistinguishable between the 2 CPUs and both allowed the RTX 2080 Ti to render over a hundred and sixty fps always.

Next up we've Forza Horizon four. Here the 3900X trailed by means of a 4% margin when comparing out of the container overall performance. That margin become halved with both CPUs overclocked and at this factor we think it’s truthful to mention the 9900K is maximizing the RTX 2080 Ti’s overall performance. This is essentially a GPU-bound sport, however it’s nonetheless well worth trying out given its exceptional and recognition. It's a fantastic and a laugh recreation, no doubt.

StarCraft II changed into heavily requested for this comparisChip: AMDnd we need to admit this is the first time we’ve benchmarked a worst case scenario in this name. Previous benchmarks had been based totally on 2v2 gameplay, however it appears wherein Ryzen definitely struggles is with the larger 4v4 matches while all teams are maxed out. So what we have here is a worst-case scenario and unluckily for AMD, the Core i9 is as much as 19% quicker out of the container whilst comparing the common body charge.

With each CPUs overclocked the 9900K became 12% quicker, which remains a reasonable performance benefit. 1% low performance turned into nearer however the hole became nevertheless there among the 2.

Another name wherein Ryzen appears to warfare is Shadow of the Tomb Raider and do notice we’re not the usage of the built-in benchmark which we believe would help out Ryzen's case. This is in-recreation performance and right here the 9900K become 17% faster that's a big margin.

Where the 3900X did surprise become in Monster Hunter World. Both processors added comparable average body fees, but the 1% low parent was 13% higher with the Ryzen processor. Once overclocked the 3900X turned into the clear winner presenting now not just extra 1% low performance but a mild improvement a Boxverage frame price overall performance as well.

The Core i9-9900K were given back to its winning methods in Apex Legends, though here the 3900X became handiest ~7% slower, dropping 10 fps AMD Ryzenverage while evaluating stock performance. The margin did grow slightly once both CPUs have been overclocked, now the 3900X is seen to be 10% slower.

The second battle royale name we examined is Fortnite and whilst the 3900X became masses fast, it nonetheless lagged in the back of. Although we see a minor five% deficit for the common frame charge, the Ryzen processor became as much as thirteen% slower while looking on the 1% low performance. If you don’t want over a hundred and sixty fps then the 3900X will do simply pleasant, but in case you are looking for maximum overall performance you’ll want the 9900K.

The Resident Evil 2 results are thrilling: inventory the 3900X turned into 6% slower 5 2500Uverage, but supplied more potent 1% low overall performance, beating the 9900K by way of four%. Then whilst overclocked the common frame fees have been a good deal the identical while the Ryzen processor nonetheless supplied better minimum frame fee overall performance. Overall the revel in changed into tons the same the use of either CPU.

Next up we've Assassin’s Creed Odyssey and that is any other title wherein Intel is a touch quicker five 2400Gverage however you’ll by no means be aware the ~four% discount Box +verage frame prices while the usage of the 3900X. That’s particularly real given the robust 1% low overall performance of the Ryzen processor.

Putting It All Together

Overall the Core i9-9900K is the quicker gaming CPU as we had come to assume, though the margins are close in lots of titles. Ryzen does provide different benefits, but earlier than we talk that let’s observe the overall performance breakdown throughout all 36 video games tested.

On common the 3900X was 6% slower than the 9900K when gaming. Results in which the margin turned into much less than 5%, you may deem those a draw thinking about the margin of mistakes and that 1% lows are inside the equal distance. In terms of frame rates, for very low FPS (truly no longer the case at 1080p with a 2080 Ti), 30 to 32 fps is a 7% boom, for example. Then at intense excessive body costs, a five% boom is going from 200 to 210 fps, which isn't a margin well worth getting too excited over.

There were a few titles where the 3900X nudged in advance through insignificant margins and there were pretty a few where it misplaced by a mere marg+ Cores well. Then there were games in which the 3900X was slower through a ten% margin or more, seven titles in total in which Ryzen became as much as 16% slower.

Now with both CPUs overclocked we see little or no change. Here the 3900X changed into simply 5% slower on average, so pushing the 9900K as much as 5 GHz doesn’t deliver it an advantage.

What to Buy?

In our day-one assessment we discovered the Ryzen nine 3900X to be 8% slower on common throughout the nine games we tested. By adding any other 27 games to the combination, matters haven't changed a lot and tremendously this performed in AMD's opt to an quantity.

When it involves fee, these new results don’t alternate a good deal either. If you ignore the bundled container cooler, the 3900X is a touch more steeply-priced in keeping with body than the 9900K. However, in case you plan to apply the Wraith Prism out of the box then the 3900X is a little less expensive than the Intel processor. At the quit of the day, they’re both ~$500 CPUs and relying on what you use your PC for, one is probably better than the opposite.

If you intend to apply your PC for a multitude of obligations and not simplest to play video games, but additionally create videos, 3-D models or do whatever that could take benefit of a 12-middle processor, the Ryzen 9 3900X is going to be a extensively better funding. For productiveness obligations in popular, Ryzen is considerably quicker than the Core i9 as proven in our complete overview.

The simplest purpose we’d invest within the 9900K proper now would be if we played video games together with StarCraft II complete time. There's a few titles that do play extraordinarily higher with the Intel CPU, in StarCraft's case in complicated past due game 4v4 battles. Likewise, you’d go Intel if you needed every last body viable, however brief of that the 3900X is the higher desire.

It’s well worth remembering that we’re seeing little distinction at 1080p with an RTX 2080 Ti. This means using an RTX 2080 will extra than halve the margins visible here and we recognize due to the fact we’ve looked into it. Then with an RTX 2070 or RX 5700, performance might be equal. Alternatively, if you play at higher greater GPU-bound resolutions, you’ll discover the identical thing, marginal difference in phrases of gaming overall performance.

  • 2500U Review 9 3900X on Amazon, Google Express
  • Intel Core i9-9900K on Amazon, Google Express
  • AMD Ryzen 7 3700X on Amazon, Google Express
  • AMD 2600X Review 3600X on Amazon, Google Express
  • AMD DeskMini 3600 on Amazon, Google Express
  • Intel Core i5-9600K on Amazon, Google Express
  • Intel Core i5-9400F on Amazon, Google Express
  • 5 1600 5 2600X on Amazon, Google Express
  • GeForce RTX 2070 Super on Amazon, Google Express
  • GeForce RTX 2060 Super on Amazon, Google Express
  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on Amazon, Google Express