Read More :

The Radeon RX 5500 XT is AMD's answer to Nvidia’s lately released GeForce GTX 1650 Super. Codenamed Navi 14, we ultimately have the brand new finances-orientated Radeon on hand. While that is technically a day-one evaluate, it’s now not the first 5500 XT evaluation to hit the web. Some fortunate contributors of the click were able to get their hands on OEM versions, permitting them to test ahead of release. Results didn’t appearance awesome, however of course, with out showed pricing facts it become tough to gauge simply how right or awful Navi 14 could be.

To compare just how true the Radeon RX 5500 XT is, we've one card from MSI and one from Gigabyte. From MSI we have their 'Gaming X' version and Gigabyte despatched their 'Gaming OC' version, each appearance very good.

The RX 5500 XT GPU uses a tiny 158mm2 die packing just 1408 cores and 88 texture devices, nearly 40% fewer than the RX 5700. There’s additionally half of as many ROPs, which has decreased the memory bus from 256-bit all the way down to 128-bit huge. This sees reminiscence bandwidth halved to 224 GB/s.

AMD has saved the GDDR6 memory and you should buy the 5500 XT with both 4 or 8GB of VRAM. We even have a 5500 XT 4GB card accessible and we'll offer an in depth 4GB vs 8GB evaluation soon, but for this assessment our recognition may be at the 8GB model.

Getting lower back to the cores, they’re clocked at 1670 MHz for the base with a lift of 1845 MHz, which means they’re clocked 7% better than the 5700. However, because there are lots much less, the TDP has been decreased from one hundred eighty watts down to 150 watts.

The 8GB model of the 5500 XT comes a Boxt $two hundred MSRP and albeit that appears a tad too formidable for the hardware specifications. The 4GB model will value $a hundred and seventy, and once more that looks like numerous money for a 4GB photographs card in 2019. Either manner, we’ll evaluation the rate to overall performance presented by means of the 5500 XT closer to the end of this evaluate, for now allow's take a look at out the ones benchmark figures.

Our GPU take a look at device is powered by way of a Core i9-9900K clocked at five GHz with 16GB of DDR4-3400 memory. We exclusively used the Gigabyte RX 5500 XT Gaming OC for testing the 5500 XT on this evaluation. We have 12 video games to study, all tested at 1080p and 1440p the use of medium to high excellent presets or settings.

Benchmarks

First up we've Shadow of the Tomb Raider and with the excessive high-quality preset enabled at 1080p, the 5500 XT became top for 77 fps a Chip:verage. Not bad performance, however no longer first-rate, given the RX 590 turned into a bit faster and the 1660 Super nearly 20% quicker.

Even at 1440p we see plenty the same and regardless of the more VRAM, the 5500 XT can’t advantage on the 1660 Super.

We see that the 5500 XT does control to edge out the RX 590 in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey with a mean of 71 fps, making it 4% faster, or an insignificant three fps. The GTX 1660 Super become 11% quicker, although the 5500 XT became 8% quicker than the GTX 1650 Super.

At 1440p we see similar margins, the 5500 XT is still on par with the GTX 1660 which additionally puts it on par with the RX 590 and GTX 1650 Super, so not a first rate result for AMD’s new $200 offering.

Using the high pleasant preset in Red Dead Redemption 2 might have been a mistake with these lower-stop GPUs as body quotes are pretty low, also the 3GB 1060 didn’t work as the texture setting became too high and you may’t override reminiscence regulations on this name. So rather than give the 3GB 1060 a bonus with the medium texture placing, we opted to bypass it for this one.

Performance at 1080p from the 5500 XT is disappointing, it most effective matched the RX 580 and GTX 1650 Super.

Things weren’t much better at 1440p and the use of the excessive best settings the sport wasn’t actually playable, so you’ll need to drop right down to medium in case you hope to play at this decision with something much less than an RX 5700 or RTX 2060.

The 5500 XT brought a clean 106 fps average at 1080p in World of Tanks, however that changed into simplest sufficient to see it located as a mid-area runner in our checking out, matching the 3GB 1060 and putting it on par with the RX 590. Still a quite unexciting result.

The 1440p end result for the 5500 XT isn’t an awful lot better, right here it’s a fraction slower than the RX 590 and no better than the a lot cheaper GTX 1650 Super.

Performance in Far Cry New Dawn is ordinary of what we’ve seen thus far, the 5500 XT is a smidgen quicker than the 590 and ~6% faster than the 1650 Super which frankly is a quite miserable end result given they need to charge $two hundred for this factor.

Not lots exceptional at 1440p: the 5500 XT and 590 are neck and neck while the $230 GTX 1660 Super is well out in front handing over almost 20% more performance. This isn’t fantastic for AMD given Nvidia is charging just 15% extra.

Frame rates in Rainbow Six Siege are sturdy at 1080p the usage of the very excessive first-rate preset, one notch down from ‘extremely’, though we're manually cranking the render scale back up to a hundred%. The GPU offers accurate overall performance ordinary, although the 5500 XT changed into still slower than the RX 590 and now not a great deal faster than the less expensive ($a hundred and sixty) GTX 1650 Super.

Much the same is visible whilst testing at 1440p, the 5500 XT only manages to maintain tempo with the GTX 1650 Super and RX 580.

The Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order performance at 1080p is common. Here the 5500 XT is slower than the GTX 1650 Super and the vintage GTX 1060 6GB. Basically it finds itself located between the 590 and 580.

Moving to 1440p allows the 5500 XT to in shape the 1650 Super and 3GB 1060, so now not excellent.

Using the high exceptional preset at 1080p in Battlefield V allowed the 5500 XT to average eighty three fps in our test which unfortunately supposed it became best capable of in shape the RX 580 and render 3fps greater than the 1650 Super Chip: AMDverage.

The extra restricted 4GB VRAM buffer seems to hurt the 1650 Super at 1440p and now the 5500 XT is capable of deliver thirteen% more performance, with 62 fps AMD Ryzenverage, however the Radeon does cost ~25% greater.

Gaming at 1440p brings approximately the identical end, it’s a whisker faster than the vintage RX 580 and barely slower than the RX 590. Let’s pass on to check out the fee in keeping with body records...

Basically the Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB is available in imparting the identical stage of value as the GTX 1660 Super, at $2.27 in keeping with frame primarily based on our 12 game sample. That approach you’ll be paying a ~4% top rate in step with frame over the RX 590 at modern costs. It's no longer a bad price in preferred, but coming from different Navi-based GPU offerings where AMD has been competitive and pushed the envelope, here it's simply slotted in between present day GeForce offerings, or worse.

The 5500 XT comes Box +t nearly 20% greater in line with body than the GTX 1650 Super, which appears to be very aggressively priced and works out outstanding for Nvidia in view that we’re talking about a similar level of overall performance average in comparison to the brand new Radeon. Granted, the 8GB 5500 XT packs two times as much VRAM, but it's nonetheless not an amazing result for AMD and people looking for a finances photographs card.

It’s additionally worth noting that the 8GB 5500 XT expenses ~14% greater per frame whilst as compared to present 8GB RX 580’s.

Misses the Mark

If you had been awaiting AMD to come back + Corend rock the boat you'll be dissapointed, as we had been. The Radeon RX 5500 XT became in no way intended to blow your socks off from a performance perspective, but we do take issue with pricing. AMD’s made no try to undercut Nvidia, as an alternative they’ve slotted the 5500 XT into Nvidia’s current pricing structure. In other phrases, they’ve rocked as much as the birthday party overdue, and supplied us nothing new.

It’s type of loopy, they were promoting us a 232mm2 die for $two hundred or much less and were doing so for over a 12 months now. We eventually get an update that’s significantly smaller at 158mm2, a 32% smaller die that gives a comparable degree of performance, and it expenses just as a great deal. No doubt 7nm supply is gambling a large role here, however we doubt lots of you care about that, that is extra of an AMD hassle to resolve.

For some time, AMD has been very competitive on pricing their mainstream GPUs a good way to remain competitive the usage of 3 year antique Polaris GPUs. This started out with the RX 480 again in June 2016, at $240 for the 8GB model. A yr later it was refreshed because the RX 580 at a $10 cut price, and with the aid of late 2018 the same GPU turned into retailing for well underneath $2 hundred.

Putting AMD’s personal products apart for a moment, the 5500 XT struggles to compete with what Nvidia’s already presenting in the GTX 1650 Super and 1660 Super. You can also argue, Nvidia made all the proper movements to secure the mainstream phase in advance of AMD's release because the Super cards are both Q4 releases. Therefore we see no cause to watch for RX 5500 stock to reach and then try to hunt one down at the MSRP. There are lots of 1650 Super and 1660 Super snap shots playing cards promoting at or very close to to the MSRP, so we’d just grab one of those or rather snag a cheap RX 580.

Power intake of the 5500 XT has been greatly stepped forward over the RX 580, but do gamers clearly care about that? It’s not like you may’t without problems energy the 580 or 590 with a reasonably-priced four hundred watt power deliver. Remember the electricity consequences on this overview had been recorded in our overclocked Core i9-9900K check system, so expect total device strength usage to be significantly lower with a Core i5 or five 2600X processor.

So even as decrease electricity consumption is actually a pleasing bonus and must result in cooler and quieter pix cards, we sense most game enthusiasts trying to spend $2 hundred or much less 5 2500U graphics card, commonly care about rate to overall performance and here the 5500 XT gives nothing new. Ultimately, we're going to must wait and see if retail pricing actions anywhere within the coming weeks and months to make the 5500 XT a greater attractive option.

Finally, a short aspect notice regarding AMD’s new Radeon software functions determined inside the Adrenaline 2020 Edition drivers, they’re wonderful and AMD should be commended for his or her work. Adding features inclusive of Integer Scaling for all Radeon GPUs is terrific and Radeon Boost seems thrilling, even though we doubt we’d use it, but still a pleasant option to have and we are certain a few game enthusiasts will locate it beneficial.

  • AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT on Amazon
  • GeForce GTX 1650 Super on Amazon
  • GeForce GTX 1660 Super on Amazon
  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on Amazon
  • GeForce RTX 2060 Super on Amazon
  • AMD Radeon RX 590 on Amazon
  • AMD Radeon RX 580 on Amazon
  • AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT on Amazon
  • AMD Radeon RX 5700 on Amazon
  • GeForce RTX 2070 Super on Amazon
  • AMD Ryzen five 3600 on Amazon