If you haven't heard approximately the 5 2600X 3500X till now it is probably due to the fact this CPU is primarily being offered and marketed to OEMs and system integrators, depending on in which you’re positioned. Initially it was said as an OEM-best part for the Chinese marketplace, but then seemed in different areas together with India. Turns out you could pretty tons purchase the 3500X everywhere, even though the conditions will range from one area to every other.

In China it seems to be selling as a regular retail product that comes a Box field with cooler and all. In Australia, you may handiest buy the 3500X Box + pre-constructed PC. Which nonetheless begs the query, how properly does it perfom and what is modified from the R5 3600?

Read More : >

We've heard thru channels that that allows you to gather the 3500X from AMD to apply as a device integrator, there are pretty a few hoops to jump thru. You should allow them to recognize your plans, what kind of machine you intend to construct, and the quantity you expect to move. We’ve also heard they may be handiest being sold in massive volumes, so 1,000+ chips.

Anyway, the Ryzen five 3500X has been to be had for buy at AliExpress for over a month and the second one they have been indexed we snapped one up for what amounted to $157 brought. It’s been sitting on our desk for a few weeks now, so we notion we higher take a look at this issue out or it became just in no way going to happen.

Let’s quickly cross over the specifications of the 3500X...

Like the 3600, it packs half of a dozen Zen 2 cores that come clocked at 3.6 GHz for the bottom. Depending at the workload they can clock as excessive as four.1 GHz out of the box, just 100 MHz decrease than that of the 3600. The key distinction is the lack of SMT (simultaneous multithreading) help for the 3500X, in which the R5 3600 packs 6-cores / 12-threads, the 3500X functions just 6 threads, much like the Core i5-9400F.

Is dropping SMT assist for a ~30% cut price from the R5 3600 well worth it? (in Australia, once more, this may range to your region). For US-primarily based shoppers it’s only a 20% discount, so we doubt that will be really worth the financial savings, + Coreny case we can recognise shortly. For trying out we've got the same old battery of gaming and productiveness benchmarks.

All CPUs were tested with 16GB of DDR4-3200 CL14 reminiscence and a RTX 2080 Ti to lessen any capability GPU bottleneck. All the cutting-edge Windows 10 patches, video games, drivers and BIOS updates available at the time of testing had been set up. Let’s get into the results.

Benchmarks

First up we've the Cinebench R20 multi-middle effects and here the 3500X doesn’t appearance notable. Yes, it’s nonetheless quicker than the Core i5-9400F, but it’s slower than even the first-gen 2600X Review 1600X. It is 6% slower than the R5 2600 and a whopping 27% slower than the R5 3600.

Naturally, for those jogging trying to run core-heavy packages, the 3500X might not be the first-class suit.

The advantage the DeskMini 3500X has over the further priced first and 2d-gen Ryzen elements (1600 and 2600 are 6-core/12-thread processors) is the advanced unmarried center performance provided via the ones Zen 2 cores.

Thus in single-core Cinebench it’s basically on par with the i7 -8700K, making it 25% faster than the R5 2600 and even 9% quicker than the Core i5-9400F.

AMD’s SMT implementation for first and 2d-gen Ryzen wasn’t in particular beneficial for compressia Chip:nd as a result the 3500X is able to in shape the 1600 and 2600 series processors. That stated, it's far 22% slower than the R5 3600, so a reasonably large drop in performance there.

AMD’s SMT has constantly worked thoroughly for decompression work, so the 3500X receives blown away as it could most effective compete with the Intel Core i5 processors in this test. This time it turned into 36% slower than the 3600 and 25% slower than the 2600.

As we noticed when checking out with Cinebench, for those seeking out a price range productiveness processor, the 3500X isn’t it. In V-ray benchmark we see that the 3500X changed into 6% slower than the antique Ryzen 1600 and nearly 20% slower than the R5 2600.

Things appearance even worse while walking the Corona benchmark, a lot worse in fact. Here the 3500X is most effective capable of in shape the Core i5-9400F, which means that it’s 27% slower than the R5 1600 and forty three% slower than the R5 2600. When in comparison to the R5 3600 we’re speaking about a 60% growth in render time, so creators Chip: AMD price range are much better off with a Ryzen 2600 or similar.

We find a comparable tale whilst testing with Blender, the 3500X took 14% longer to finish the workload than a primary generation 5 2500U 1600, which means it became a whole lot slower than the R5 2600 and R5 3600.

The removal of SMT support way the 3500X loses pretty a chunk of its electricity performance. For example, wherein it was 14% slower than the primary-gen R5 1600, general system draw is just 10% lower, That determine consists of all gadget additives, but nonetheless you’d assume the more recent 7nm part to honest a good deal better. Yet again, energy intake is infrequently a challenge right here as 141-watt total gadget load for a core-heavy workload is nothing.

Gaming Benchmarks

Time for a few game benchmarks and we’ll start things off with Assassin's Creed: Odyssey at 1080p the usage of the very high first-class settings. As a reminder, we are using a excessive-quit RTX 2080 Ti for testing.

Here the 3500X is corresponding to the Core i5-9400F along side the primary and second-gen 2500U Review parts. That's to say overall performance is ideal, however we get the sensation it gained’t be lengthy before 6-thread processors which include the 3500X and 9400F move the manner of the Core i5-7600K.

ACO does end up a bit greater GPU sure at 1440p and this enables the 3500X out as it’s no longer capable of healthy the Agon 2600X, and definitely supply comparable performance to the R5 3600. Performance from the mid-range to top cease is quite similar beneath those greater GPU restricted check conditions.

Battlefield V is an instance wherein 6 threads or maybe eight threads are becoming insufficient. Here the 3500X introduced a comparable level of performance to a Core-7700K and Core i5-9400F, and even though the common frame charge looks pretty good it’s the 1% low overall performance that suffers.

Granted the game remains very playable and drastically better than the quad-core 7600K, but you may see rather larger frame dips whilst as compared to the 12-threaded and better CPUs.

The 1% low overall performance become progressed by means of 11% with the R5 1600 and 14% for the R5 2600. However, it’s the R5 3600 that in reality steps matters up, boosting 1% low performance through almost 30%.

Far Cry New Dawn is the least CPU disturbing sport we've tested thus far, so unsurprisingly the 3500X would not go through negative 1% low overall performance here, in reality it’s a bit better than the 3600 in that regard. Overall performance became the same and not a exceptional deal better than the 2nd-gen Ryzen.

At 1440p we see the identical conduct, so for older and much less annoying titles the six-threaded 3500X will be flawlessly excellent, no surprises there.

Hitman 2 played nicely on the 3500X, clearly well sufficient in spite of the 1% lows taking a bigger hit than what you’ll enjoy AMD Ryzen present day eight and 12-thread processor. Performance universal was comparable to the Mobile 2600, as a minimum whilst trying out at 1080p.

Even at 1440p the weaker than anticipated 1% low performance persists and although common body quotes are similar to the second-gen 2600 and 2600X, the minimum body rates are lots lower.

Finally we've got Total War: Three Kingdoms and here the 3500X is comparable to the first-gen Ryzen five 1600X, so the 3600 was a great deal higher whilst looking at 1% low figures. Here the 3600 was nearly 40% faster which is a big overall performance uplift thanks to using SMT.

Once we pass to 1440p wherein the GPU is the maximum crucial component, all margins are nullified and here the 3500X plays much like any other CPU in our chart, it’s just the R5 1600 that falls a bit off the tempo right here.

Is It Worth It?

That’s all of the blue bar graphs we've for you (almost!), now it’s time to decide if the Ryzen 5 3500X is worth shopping for, must you come across it. For those shopping for nowadays, the high-quality fee we’ve located on line is $155 and as we said in advance, that makes it about ~20% less expensive than the R5 3600 within the US. For fellow Aussies, it’s approximately 30% inexpensive.

Depending on pricing in your area for first, and specifically 2nd-gen Ryzen, the 3500X may additionally or won't be worth it. In the States, the Ryzen five 2600 can be had for just $120 and frankly at that charge it’s a miles better deal, and that’s irrespective of what you intend on doing with your gadget.

For productivity duties the R5 2600 is really the better preference as it became quicker than the 3500X in each unmarried center-heavy workload we ran. Couple the better overall performance with the lower price and you've got an obvious winner. Even with regards to gaming, the advanced IPC of the 3500X’s Zen 2 cores cannot make up for the lack of SMT assist and to higher illustrate that, right here’s a look at a few up to date fee according to body graphs.

Here we are able to see whilst searching at frame fee performance at a 7-sport common, the 3500X become best able to suit the second one-gen Ryzen 5 2600. You’re looking at spending 6% extra in step with body which makes it a worse cost desire for US and Australian gamers right now.

Moreover, if you only had the selection of a 6-middle/6-thread processor for about $a hundred and fifty, the 3500X or the 9400F, we’d go with Intel each time for gaming. But since the Ryzen five 2600 exists, that’s the plain choice here.

For the ones concerned approximately gaming overall performance now not just these days, but i7 -8550U year or two, the 3500X makes even less sense. If we study 1% low performance across the 7 video games examined you get an excellent idea of how limited this CPU will finally be.

In the absence of first or second-gen Ryzen parts with greater threads, would the 3500X really worth buying? If you're commonly gaming we’d propose the Core i5-9400F as an alternative, whilst for productivity you can move either way. The actual situation is that AMD is offloading Ryzen 3600 processors that did not pass quality warranty to OEMs, and for price range pre-constructed PCs, this could make sense.

For shopping for off the shelf although, given the guarantee issues you might run into with the 3500X, the Core i5-9400F looks like the better preference at $150. As a 6-middle/6-thread processor, the 9400F likely isn’t the wisest investment either. The exceptional price range CPU right now's the Ryzen five 2600 or Ryzen 5 2400G (if you need included snap shots) or coughing up the greater $50 for the Ryzen 5 3600, that is an superb CPU for the money with a purpose to absolute confidence maintain up well for years yet to come.

  • Ryzen 5 five 3600 on Amazon
  • AMD Ryzen 7 3700X on Amazon
  • 5 1600 3 3400G on Amazon
  • 1600 (B350) three 2400G on Amazon
  • Intel Core i5-9600K on Amazon
  • Intel Core i5-9400F on Amazon
  • AMD Radeon RX 5700 on Amazon
  • GeForce RTX 2070 Super on Amazon
  • GeForce RTX 2060 Super on Amazon