Today we’re evaluating the Ryzen 9 3950X and Core i9-9900KS a Box huge number of games, using one of g.skill’s maximum premium 16GB reminiscence kits, the Trident Z Neo DDR4-3600 CL14. For the ones of you spending $600 or $750 a Chip: CPU, buying fine in magnificence DDR4 memory doesn’t appear like a stretch, however the main purpose we went with this reminiscence became so we could carry you a head to head evaluation between AMD and Intel processors the use of manually tuned timings.

Read More : >It was discovered in the early days of AMD’s Zen structure that memory bandwidth and latency were critical for maximizing overall performance of Ryzen processors. Manually tuning up the secondary and tertiary timings can constantly enhance Ryzen’s overall performance in games.

In other words, that is a evaluation of Intel and AMD's pinnacle laptop CPUs that do not belong to their HEDT series, with each processors tweaked for max reminiscence overall performance.

For this Ryzen nine 3950X vs. Core i9-9900KS contrast we have tested a complete of 18 games at 1080p using a GeForce RTX 2080 Ti. Both CPUs have been examined in their inventory out of the box configuration with XMP for the Trident Z Neo DDR4-3600 CL14 memory loaded. Then we've got brought a 2nd configuration which sees the g.skill memory timings manually tuned. The Core i9 was set up Chip: AMD Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra and, while Ryzen nine used the Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master.

Before we leap into the gaming benchmarks, here’s a short study memory bandwidth. As you could see the tuned timings most effective raise bandwidth through four% for the 3950X and three% for the 9900KS.

Memory latency for the 3950X became additionally best reduced by five% and three% for the 9900KS, so primarily based on the ones figures you wouldn’t assume plenty of a overall performance gain in games, however as you’re about to look that’s not the case.

Gaming Benchmarks

The first recreation we tested is Hitman 2 where the 9900KS is 21% faster than the 3950X out of the box, pretty a big performance margin. However, the 3950X enjoys a large 24% performance increase with the tuned reminiscence, going from 117 fps AMD Ryzenverage up to an impressive a hundred forty five fps.

The 9900KS also advantages from tuned reminiscence although, now not pretty to the identical degree as Ryzen however we nevertheless see a ten% performance uplift on this identify that is sufficient for Intel to hold the lead, albeit a smaller eight% margin.

Next up we have Resident Evil 2 and here the 3950X performs exceptionally well with the CL14 DDR4-3600 reminiscence, barely edging out the 9900KS both stock and tuned. For this identify the tuned reminiscence has almost no impact on performance, at most we see a 3% boom in 1% low performance.

Moving on to Project Cars 2 we see some other moderate three% performance gain for the 9900KS.

The 3950X won a extra noteworthy eleven fps for an eight% boom in frame charge. Not thoughts-blowing however it’s sufficient to vicinity AMD beforehand of Intel on this name, in particular when looking at 1% low performance.

Gains in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege are uneventful for both processors. We’re searching at a ~3% increase which has Intel presenting a four% overall performance increase, even though with tightly grouped 1% low overall performance the enjoy turned into identical the use of either CPU.

Here are a few exciting effects in Battlefield V. Tuning up the memory with the 9900KS has without a doubt no effect on overall performance, besides a five% improvement in 1% low performance. That’s not anything as compared to the 21% increase in 1% low overall performance visible by the 3950X. The common body fee changed into additionally boosted by means of 17%. This turned into enough to position the 3950X just in advance of the 9900KS, although it was barely down for the 1% low metric. Still once grew to become up, those CPUs enable an identical gaming experience.

Out of the box the 9900KS is 5% faster than the 3950X whilst testing with Assassin’s Creed Odyssey, or an additional three fps. With the tuned reminiscence that margin shrinks to 2.5% and now we are searching at a 1-2 fps distinction, so the identical gaming experience with both processor.

Moving on we have the World of Tanks results and right here we’re looking at up to a four% increase from the memory tuning, quite unnecessary for this title. Also those numbers can’t be as compared to earlier World of Tanks consequences as we’re the use of an updated replay for trying out.

We’ve also updated our Metro Exodus take a look at, we are now Box + a whole lot latter phase of the game that is extra disturbing. Interestingly, although the 1% low performance is identical between the 3950X and 9900KS, the Intel CPU is quite a bit quicker while comparing the common body fee, 14% faster out of the container and nine% once both CPUs are the usage of the tuned reminiscence timings.

In Fortnite, Intel’s Core i9-9900KS sees almost no development with the tuned memory, we’re talking just 2-3 fps at properly over 100 fps. The 3950X enjoys a five-10% performance boost, however in spite of this as soon as tuned up the 9900KS changed into nonetheless 9% quicker when comparing 1% low statistics.

This time it’s the 9900KS that advantages the maximum from the tuned reminiscence because the common body rate is elevated with the aid of 5% and the 1% low result by using 14%. Even so this meant the 9900KS was just 2.5% faster than the 3950X, so the equal overall performance then.

Out of the box the 3950X lags behind quite a chunk in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order. The 9900KS is eighteen% quicker while evaluating 1% low performance and 12% faster for the common body rate. The tuned reminiscence doesn’t improve overall performance for the 9900KS but it does permit an 8 to fourteen% overall performance uplift for the 3950X and now each CPUs are seen delivering comparable overall performance.

Very small performance gains are visible in Modern Warfare while walking the tuned memory and each CPUs added sincerely same overall performance. The 3950X did provide barely better 1% low performance, though the margins are so small there’s virtually no risk you’ll notice the difference when gaming.

Last up we've got Shadow of the Tomb Raider and here the 3950X saw a huge 21% boom in 1% low overall performance with the tuned reminiscence and a 17% increase for the average body fee. Meanwhile, Intel saw no development in 1% low performance and just a 6% boom for the common frame charge. This manner whilst the 9900KS changed into eleven% quicker out of the container, with the tuned reminiscence the 3950X just controlled to hit the lead.

Performance summary

The consequences appeared to be a chunk all around the region, sometimes the tuned memory furnished robust gains, different times those gains were moderate and just as often we saw no gains in any respect. What did appear clean turned into the marginal overall performance distinction among the Ryzen 9 3950X and Core i9-9900KS for gaming. To get a better feel of that allow’s test out the overall performance across all titles...

Out of the field the 3950X turned into observed to be 6% slower 5 2500Uverage while in comparison to the 9900KS, precisely the same margin visible among the 3900X and 9900K whilst the usage of the slower DDR4-3200 reminiscence (facts from a previous overview). Then with the tuned memory the 3950X was 4% slower 5 2400Gverage which for all sensible purposes is truely an identical gaming revel in + Corell cutting-edge titles.

Here’s a better examine the performance difference on a in keeping with game basis, inventory the 9900KS changed into 7% faster which as we just noticed supposed the 3950X turned into 6% slower. Out of the container the bigger wins for the 9900KS were visible in Hitman 2, The Division 2, Metro Exodus, Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order, Shadow of the Tomb Raider and Fortnite.

Now with each CPUs utilising the tuned memory timings the 9900KS changed into simply four% quicker on common and this time it’s World of Tanks, Metro Exodus and Hitman where Intel sees its largest wins. We see a large exchange for Shadow of the Tomb Raider, so permit’s take a better take a look at the gains Ryzen obtained from the tuned memory.

Across the 18 games we examined, the 3950X noticed a fantastically minor 6% performance improvement on common from the tuned DDR4 reminiscence. The best double digit gains had been visible whilst benchmarking Hitman 2 and Shadow of the Tomb Raider, that’s about it. Moreover, just 1/2 the video games examined noticed less than a five% performance growth with the faster reminiscence.

Wrap Up

There you have it, in case you've ever visible or grow to be part of a dialogue involving tuned memory and contemporary mainstream flagship CPUs, the Ryzen nine 3950X and Core i9-9900KS (or the ordinary 9900K), those benchmarks evaluating stock and tuned gaming overall performance must come up with masses of arguments.

The inventory results had been wonderful on their very own with the Trident Z Neo reminiscence. If you had been using memory with looser timings and extra headroom for tuning, at least relative to the out of the container timings, then the profits would be more excessive. As we noted earlier, in case you’re spending over $500 on your CPU and possibly $1,000 or so on the GPU, then springing for top class DDR4 reminiscence possibly isn’t a stretch.

But if you are shopping for a greater lower priced CPU which includes the Ryzen 9 3900X or maybe one of the Ryzen 7 models, what we’ve located is that you don’t want to spend money on top class DDR4 reminiscence. We showed this in our 3rd-gen Ryzen DDR4 memory scaling benchmark. Then we used realistic gaming situations (now not 1080p with an RTX 2080 Ti) and the progressed reminiscence performance had little to no effect on body rates.

This testing also confirms the Core i9-9900K remains a top gaming CPU and the quickest for the rate. However, we wouldn't call it the remaining answer definitely because it doesn’t maintain the performance crown with the aid of a extensive margin.

When compared to the 3900X which expenses approximately the equal, it’s ~five% quicker on common for gaming, however the Ryzen 9 comes with a cooler and it’s miles faster in center heavy programs, anywhere from 20 to 60% faster. We also trust the more cores will destiny evidence the Ryzen higher, but that’s likely much less of a problem for those shopping for now as you’ll in all likelihood improve in three to 4 year's time.

  • Intel Core i9-9900KS on Amazon
  • Intel Core i9-9900K on Amazon
  • 2500U Review nine 3950X on Amazon
  • 5 1600 nine 3900X on Amazon
  • 1600 (B350) 7 3700X on Amazon
  • AMD 5 2600X 3600 on Amazon
  • Intel i7 -9700K on Amazon
  • Intel Core-8700K on Amazon
  • GeForce RTX 2080 Ti on Amazon
  • GeForce RTX 2070 Super on Amazon
  • AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT on Amazon
  • AMD Radeon RX 5700 on Amazon