Today we ultimately get to show you how the Ryzen 9 3950X plays. Earlier this yr at Computex we weren't positive if we’d see a sixteen-middle AM4 CPU happen, however AMD placed that one to relaxation whilst it introduced the 3950X later a Chip:t E3. Originally because of hit shelves in September, AMD driven the release a couple of months and is now slated to go on sale November 25. That way you get to see all the overall performance figures and records properly ahead of release.

That’s top information considering the 3950X is not inexpensive. At $750 it nonetheless does nicely relative to the Intel opposition though. The 8-core 9900K, as an example, currently retails for $500, so paying 50% more for one hundred% greater cores, that would become being a rather bargain.

The Ryzen 9 3950X does appearance to bridge the gap among mainstream and high-give up computer platforms, at the least existing excessive-end laptop structures. Third-gen Threadripper will trade that later this month. But the factor is that never earlier than have we had such an severe CPU Chip: AMD mainstream platform, and that is truely the most highly-priced mainstream platform CPU we’ve seen a Box long time.

Read More :

The i7 -2600K got here Box +t $320, the 4790K retailed for $340, the 8700K driven up to $360 and now we have the Core i9-9900K at round $500. The Ryzen nine 3900X become a big deal for AMD, matching Intel at the $500 price point, and legitimately as properly, not like what they did with the 1800X.

... The 3950X places AMD in the function to command a charge premium for computer computing. But is their new 16-core/32-thread monster really worth the asking fee?

But the 3950X is going beyond that and that puts AMD within the function to command a rate premium for computing device computing. But is their new 16-core/32-thread monster well worth the asking price? Given what we’ve seen from the 3900X, you’d think it might be if you may positioned all the ones cores to work, but of route we’ll run a few checks and get to the lowest of it.

In terms of specifications, the 3950X is much like the 3900X: you get sixteen cores opposed to 12, and the boost clock velocity has been raised by means of one hundred MHz, presumably due to the 3950X getting higher silicon. But in an effort to keep in the 105w TDP, the base clock has been dropped from 3.eight GHz down to 3.five GHz, even though we are waiting for the all-middle clock frequency to be similar.

Another difference among those CPUs is packaging: the 3900X comes bundled with the Wraith Prism RGB cooler, at the same time as the 3950X doesn’t include a cooler at all, so that you will want to element inside the added fee of a exceptional cooler.

For checking out we’re the usage of the brand new Corsair HydroX cooling equipment on the Gigabyte X570 Aorus Xtreme. For the block we’ve used the XC7, the XR5 360mm radiator and the XD5 pump/reservoir combination, all at the Praxis WetBench. Eventually we’ll improve all this right into a right test case however because of restricted time that is what we have for now. We’ve also used this setup to re-take a look at the 3900X, 3800X and 3700X, updating the results where necessary. We’re also the usage of DDR4-3200 CL14 memory for all cutting-edge AMD and Intel processors.

The eighth and ninth-gen Intel Core processors were benchmaked at the Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra, cooled the usage of the Corsair Hydro H115i RGB Platinum 280mm all-in-one liquid cooler. Note the Intel CPUs are not TDP limited, so we are showing the nice case state of affairs for out of the box performance. Finally, the portraits card of choice turned into the MSI Trio GeForce RTX 2080 Ti. Let’s now get into the benchmark outcomes...

Benchmarks

You can see why Intel has been looking to downplay Cinebench’s relevance for CPU overall performance, the 3950X is a whopping 89% quicker than the 9900K, so for those of you who use Maxon’s Cinema 4D, the 3950X is well and definitely really worth the premium over the 9900K. That’s quite the Cinebench R20 score.

The 3950X changed into also 27% faster than the 3900X and even as that does make it worse cost, if time is cash then the top class may be easily justified. While I suspect 2950X proprietors may be keeping out for 3rd-gen Threadripper, those thinking of snapping up the 2nd-gen 16-core processor will want to get it for $500 or much less given the 3950X is nearly 30% faster. Of course the 2950X gives extra PCI Express lanes, but if you can make do with an X570 board, then the 3950X could be the higher choice.

That four.7 GHz max single core enhance clock allowed the 3950X to score 529 pts out of the box, a 2% increase over the 3900X, which makes sense given it have to be clocking around 2% higher on this test. Perhaps extra brilliant is the reality that it virtually edged out the 9900KS, making it the quickest computer CPU in this unmarried center take a look at.

Here’s a quick study sustained memory bandwidth performance and as predicted the 3950X could be very much like all different third-gen Ryzen CPUs that we’ve examined thus far.

WinRAR overall performance is considerably advanced with the third-gen Ryzen however then again the 12 and sixteen-center models nevertheless path Intel's 8-core 9900K and are some way in the back of the 12-center 9920X.

The 3950X also didn’t seem to enhance upon the 3900X that is exciting, though we noticed a similar issue with the Threadripper 2920X and 2950X, just to a barely lesser degree.

The 3950X is simply 2% faster than the 3900X in 7-Zip’s compression check and that supposed even as it changed into eight% faster than the 2950X, it changed into still 5% slower than the Core i9-9920X.

It’s decompression work in which Ryzen has usually excelled and right here the 3950X blows everything out of the water, beating the 9920X by way of an superb 73% margin. It turned into also 25% quicker than the 2950X and a little over 30% faster than the 3900X, so a first rate end result for the new AM4 16-core processor.

Unfortunately we see little to no overall performance advantage over the 3900X on the subject of encoding overall performance in Adobe Premiere Pro CC 2020 version. When in comparison to the 3900X, the 3950X was simply 3% quicker which is surprising given they operated at comparable clock speeds on this check and CPU usage become over ninety% with both elements.

That said if we examine every processor side via side with the Windows Task manager open, you may pretty truely see four of the 3950X cores aren’t being fully utilized and that is why the 3950X can’t further distance itself from the 3900X.

The 3950X also plays well within the V-Ray benchmark, supplying nearly 30% extra overall performance than the Core i9-9920X and over 80% greater than the 9900K, so some other absolutely strong result for the pink group.

Next up we've Corona where the 3950X was 25% quicker than the 2950X which is a large step forward. It changed into almost 30% quicker than Intel’s Core i9-9920X, as well as the 12-center 3900X. It also blew Intel’s mainstream 9900K out of the water as it was 71% faster.

The remaining application benchmark we ran become Blender Open Data and right here the 3950X supplied a 29% development over the 3900X and 37% greater overall performance than the 2950X. It also decimated the 9920X through a 56% marg+ Corend the 9900K by using an 87% margin.

It’s additionally crazy to think that approximately three years ago, the Core-7700K turned into the flagship mainstream desktop component, the 3950X is kind of 300% quicker, for 130% more money.

Power Consumption

Something unusual approximately the Ryzen nine 3950X and some thing that makes it special is simply how efficient it's far. Despite imparting 29% greater overall performance than the 3900X in the Blender benchmark, the 3950X virtually consumed a few watts much less, that’s actually insane. This additionally method for an 87% overall performance boost over the 9900K, you’re looking at equal strength consumption.

Something unusual about the Ryzen nine 3950X and some thing that makes it special is just how efficient it is.

We’ve triple checked these results simply to make certain, the 3950X and 3900X along with the other Ryzen processors have been examined on the identical board, with the same BIOS the usage of the equal settings and cooling. We additionally cross referenced the results with the folks over at Gamers Nexus and they determined very comparable power intake figures, so we’re confident in the accuracy of those numbers.

So why does the 3950X best push general system consumption to the same degree as the 3900X? In a word: binning. It’s simply higher silicAMD Ryzennd therefore can function at plenty lower voltages. Whereas the 3900X normally ran at among 1.275 and 1.3v, the 3950X ran at simply 1.150v, that means the 3900X required around 13% more voltage five 2500Uverage. Combine this with a 3% growth in clock velocity and this is why the 3950X and 3900X devour comparable levels of strength.

The F1 2019 consequences have also been updated with the DX12 API and right here we see some effective outcomes for the 3950X because it edged out both the i7 -9700K and Core i9-9900K, losing out simplest to the 9900KS by using a small margin.

Oddly though growing the decision sees the Ryzen processors drop off, as well as the Core i9-9920X and that is very just like what we noticed while trying out The Division 2. It’s no longer a massive drop off, however given the 1080p effects you'll expect the 3950X to be trailing nearly all Intel CPUs by a 5% marg Core-8550Ut 1440p.

The ultimate sport we’re going to have a look at is Borderlands three and again the 3950X can be seen acting well at 1080p. Here it suits the 9900KS, although it become no faster than the 3900X.

Even at 1440p it only matched the 3900X and notwithstanding being 2-3 fps down on the Intel CPUs, it became 1-2 fps faster for the 1% low result. So whilst this could not be the maximum CPU annoying recreation accessible, the 3950X does nicely.

Overclocking

Here’s a quick study overclocking overall performance, the usage of 1.325v the 3950X ran one hundred% stable at an all-middle of four.three GHz. It’s possible we should have pushed it to 4.4 GHz, but with restrained time to validate the overclock we stopped at four.3 GHz. We nonetheless broke the 10K barrier with a Cinebench rating of 10046 pts, so that’s a nine% overall performance bump. We additionally observed that actually permitting PBO boosted overall performance by five%.

The gains in Blender have been milder, here PBO boosted overall performance by 3%, while the guide overclock stepped forward things by way of a 7% margin.

If you’re after most performance at the cost of the whole thing else, then overclocking the 3950X makes feel, but if you care in any respect approximately efficiency, then it sincerely doesn’t.

For the small 3-5% overall performance boom that PBO offers, you’re looking at over a 25% growth in overall machine consumpti5 2400Gnd then an nearly 40% growth for the four.three GHz guide overclock.

Due to restricted time, we don’t have a whole heap of thermal statistics for the 3950X, as a minimum now not with a variety of different cooling answers. For now we just have the statistics with the custom Corsair HydroX loop and for contrast we've thermal records with the 3900X.

Stock the 3950X peaked at simply 64 C after an hour long Blender stress take a look at i7-8550U Ultraportable 21c room. The CPU ran at 1.150v and maintained a clock pace of 4025 MHz by using the end of the strain test.

For contrast, the 3900X peaked at sixty eight C beneath the identical conditions, meaning the 3950X absolutely ran a tad cooler. The 3900X did maintain a clock speed of 4100 MHz, though as we saw when measuring energy intake, the voltage turned into a chunk better which resulted inside the brought warmth.

In different words, any cooler able to tackling the 3900X, will have no trouble with the 3950X.

The New Performance King, But Who Is It For?

Going into this assessment, we have been excited to sooner or later test the Ryzen 9 3950X, but we weren’t expecting any huge surprises. It's essentially a 3900X with four more cores. All matters being same, it’ll be as much as 33% faster and we simply noticed that during applications which include 7-zip and Blender.

But whilst we measured electricity consumption, that’s while we discovered just how marvelous the 3950X is. We’re nonetheless blown away by the truth that it offers nearly 30% more overall performance, but consumes some watts less than the 3900X. The 3950X clearly showcases what’s feasible with TSMC’s 7nm system.

This development in silicon fine does make the 12% price top rate you pay according to center for the 3950X over the 3900X really worth it. As a side word though, if you suit the 3900X and 3950X’s clock speeds and voltage, the sixteen-core model does consume round 30-40% extra strength as you’d count on because it packs 33% greater cores.

Over the beyond month or so, we have been asked a lot whether or not you ought to wait for the 3950X or simply snap up a discounted Threadripper 2950X. Our recommendation has been to watch for 3950X reviews and we’re satisfied that’s what we recommended given how desirable the 3950X is. Right now the TR 2950X retails for $680 however it’s around 30% slower and pushes total device intake 30% better. So in phrases of overall performance and efficiency, the 2950X is the inferior choice except for those more PCIe lanes.

The Ryzen 9 3950X also has the advantage of more inexpensive motherboards. You can throw this aspect on a first rate B450 board for a little over $100 and we’ll be doing just that in a new assessment quickly. Meanwhile a respectable X399 board charges around $three hundred. Ultimately we feel for most people the 3950X and 3900X have placed down the 1st and 2d-gen Threadripper collection.

As for Intel, the R9 3950X is genuinely a much better CPU than the $1,050 Core i9-9920X. However, that component will be refreshed very soon because the Core i9-10920X for only $seven-hundred. While the 12-middle Intel CPU consumes a comparable level of energy, it’s frequently closely outgunned in phrases of uncooked performance. There are times where the 10920X will win, but simplest by a slim margin, even as there are lots more times in which the 3950X absolutely buries it. For a comparable level of workstation performance you’ll want to spend $800 on the 10940X, or $1,000 on the 10980XE to overcome AMD's greatest AM4 CPU.

AMD has introduced a "mainstream" AM4 part which can rival and outcompete the first-class excessive-stop laptop CPUs Intel has to provide. This explains why 3rd-gen Threadripper is so damn steeply-priced as AMD appears to separate their mainstream and high-cease desktop structures. But with the $1,four hundred 24-core 3960X supplying extra PCIe lanes than maximum of you’ll understand what to do with, and twice the L3 cache of the 3950X, third-gen Threadripper is going to be sincerely excessive-end computing device stuff.

We'll get the danger to evaluate third-gen Threadripper later this month, along with Intel’s Cascade Lake-X collection. But for now we’re critically impressed with what the 3950X gives at $750. It’s a really correct alternative for anyone after a powerful sixteen-middle processor.

  • 2500U Review nine 3950X on Amazon
  • 5 1600 nine 3900X on Amazon
  • AMD Ryzen 7 3700X on Amazon
  • AMD 5 2600X 3600 on Amazon
  • Intel Core i9-9900KS on Amazon
  • Intel Core i9-9900K on Amazon
  • Intel Core i7-9700K on Amazon
  • Intel Core i7-8700K on Amazon
  • GeForce RTX 2080 Ti on Amazon
  • GeForce RTX 2070 Super on Amazon
  • AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT on Amazon
  • AMD Radeon RX 5700 on Amazon