When we reviewed the new 5 2600X 3600 we had masses of nice things to say approximately it, and be aware that in our evaluation we in comparison it to the more luxurious Core i5-9600K. Regardless, that became a warfare that AMD largely received. Even so, we have seen many requests of an instantaneous contrast to the Core i5-9400F which is now greater inexpensive than ever at simply $a hundred and fifty.

The 9400F is the most inexpensive ninth technology Core i5 processor you could buy. For the past two months it is been provided at the $150 fee point which is kind of a fifteen% cut price when you consider that release. That additionally makes it 25% cheaper than the R5 3600, so budget-minded builders can be thinking about going Intel in any case. Does it make experience?

Read More :

To answer that we’ll examine each CPUs a Box variety of games and packages. Both had been examined using their blanketed box cooler -- sure, Intel’s awful field cooler works simply best with the 9400F and it’s no longer even loud, as the locked part is very energy green.

We're using 16GB of DDR4-3200 CL14 memory for both CPUs, which means the 9400F was examined on a Z390 motherboard. Given you could snag this kind of for as low as $one hundred twenty-a hundred thirty these days, we didn't see the problem. You’ll be paying similar cash for a great B450 board.

The pix card of preference turned into the effective RTX 2080 Ti to reduce any ability GPU bottlenecks. The modern-day Windows updates and drivers to be had on the time of testing have been installed. Let’s get into the results...

Productivity Benchmarks

As regular we’ll start with Cinebench and right here we see just what the 9400F is up towards in middle heavy workloads as the R5 3600 changed into 52% quicker, that’s extra than an entire tier approximately the Core i5 processor.

However, perhaps a more ominous signal for the Intel 6-center processor is the unmarried middle test, right here the R5 3600 changed into nevertheless 14% quicker, so it’s uncommon which you’ll find a productivity workload in which the 9400F can match the 3600, not to mention beat it.

Speaking of which, we've WinRAR, a traditionally sturdy showing for Intel processors. That’s not the case although with the appearance of third-gen Ryzen. Here the R5 3600 changed into eighty four% faster, so pretty the shellacking there.

Moving on to 7-zip, the R5 3600 was 57% faster when evaluating compression overall performance and it's great that the margin widens further when evaluating decompression overall performance where the 3600 became sixty six% faster.

Adobe Premiere indicates the Core i5's satisfactory showing but because the R5 3600 turned into 26% quicker. Still a big win for AMD but at least the margin is rather competitive this time.

The R5 3600 quick receives lower back to crushing it though with a forty nine% win within the V-Ray benchmark. Let’s see what is in save for our closing productivity checks.

When checking out with Corona, the R5 3600 turned into fifty eight% quicker than the 9400F taking just 146 seconds to complete the take a look at in opposition to the Core i5's 230 seconds.

And ultimately when running the Blender Open Data benchmark, the Ryzen is fifty three% faster.

Power Consumption

The Intel Core i5 9400F gets its first win. It ate up 22% less power than the R5 3600 in the Blender benchmark although you must soak up attention that it became also 35% slower, so overall performance consistent with watt still favors the Ryzen processor.

Gaming Benchmarks

Moving on to gaming testing, first up we've got Assassin's Creed: Odyssey. Here the R5 3600 boosted frame rates by way of nearly 30% over the 9400F and I count on we’ll see extra effects like this in middle heavy games.

The Ryzen processor changed into simply 6% quicker in Battlefield V when searching on the common frame charge, however 34% quicker while measuring 1% low performance, The R5 3600 did provide a notably smoother gaming enjoy on this name.

The gaming revel in when testing with Shadow of the Tomb Raider became similar with both CPUs, although the average frame price changed into four% higher with the R5 3600, even as the 1% low overall performance become progressed with the aid of 10%.

We also see a solid performance uplift in The Division 2, the R5 3600 provided an 18% performance uplift for the common frame charge and a 29% raise for the 1% low.

Overall the R5 3600 become 20% more highly-priced in line with frame whilst using common body rates for the calculation but we feel that this does not paint the entire image for gaming because at times the 9400F wasn’t nearly as smooth because the Ryzen processor, so let’s test the 1% low consequences.

Here the R5 3600 was 12% greater luxurious in step with body. The margin is smaller but you ought to also think about CPU heavy titles where the 9400F was stuttering a bit (Battlefield V and Assassin’s Creed Odyssey, for example). It need to be noted also that so long as AMD keeps offering the Ryzen 2600, it gives kind of the identical fee to overall performance ratio, however on AMD's extra attractive platform and with an advantage in productivity responsibilities.

Ever for the reason that AMD launched the AM4 platform entire with a slew of Ryzen processors no longer simplest have they supported 2, four, 6, 8 and now 12-core processors, all on the identical socket, however they’ve managed to accomplish that across three CPU generations. This makes recommending Intel’s 8th and 9th era LGA1151 platform difficult in 2019. Short of constructing a high-give up i7 -9700K or i9-9900K rig, we are able to’t think of a state of affairs in which it makes full experience.

The Core i5-9400F is a great processor today, however when you don't forget the platform, future improve alternatives are slender. In years you’ll preferably need more than six threads and you may be stuck to 2d hand 8700K, 9700K or 9900K processors for a greater powerful drop-in alternative. Unfortunately we do not believe the potentialities might be high-quality then either. Hoping over to eBay we determined the cost of Core-7700K finished listings -- this is 7th-gen Core i5 owners seeking to improve -- spending 2600X Review 3600 cash on the 36 month vintage quad-core.

But back to today's assessment, the DeskMini 3600 destroys the Core i5-9400F in center-heavy video games and packages. It presently charges 33% more, but it became regularly 50% faster Box +pplications and furnished kind of 30% gains in cutting-edge games.

If you best have $one hundred fifty to spend a Chip: CPU, then the R5 2600 can be one of your fine bets as that offers you the ability to improve to the 3700X, 3900X or 3950X a few years later and those CPUs will nearly actually be low priced on the second one hand market + Core few years time.

  • AMD Ryzen 3600 on Amazon, Google Express
  • Intel Core i5-9400F on Amazon, Google Express
  • five 2500U 5 2600 on Amazon, Google Express
  • AMD Ryzen 7 3700X on Amazon, Google Express
  • 5 1600 nine 3900X on Amazon, Google Express
  • Intel Core i5-9600K on Amazon, Google Express
  • GeForce RTX 2070 Super on Amazon, Google Express
  • GeForce RTX 2060 Super on Amazon, Google Express
  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on Amazon, Google Express