Read More :

As part of the huge Zen 2 Ryzen processor release, AMD released two Ryzen 3000 components that include a images issue. The new Ryzen 3 3200G and five 2600X 3400G APUs are honest upgrades in comparison to the fashions they update, beginning at $99 and $149 respectively.

AMD is the use of the Zen+ architecture, which means these APUs are manufactured the usage of the 12nm method, which gives improved clock speeds and thermals. The R5 3400G gets a cooler upgrade out of the box with the Wraith Spire, even as the 3200G continues the bottom Wraith Stealth. The 3400G additionally does away with the thermal paste interface cloth and it’s soldered similar to the massive boy chips.

The 3400G CPU cores had been overclocked by means of 8% from three.9 GHz to four.2 GHz, at the same time as the Vega eleven portraits engine comes clocked at 1.four GHz, a 12% increase from the 2400G. The charge decal has additionally obtained a mild bargain with the R5 3400G beginning at $149, or $20 decrease than the 2400G at release.

  Ryzen 3 2200G 2600X Review 2400G Ryzen three 3200G DeskMini 3400G
Launch Price $ninety nine $169 $99 $149
Cores/Threads four/four 4/8 four/four 4/eight
Base Clock three.five GHz 3.6 GHz 3.6 GHz 3.7 GHz
Boost Clock three.7 GHz three.nine GHz four.zero GHz four.2 GHz
Cache 4MB 4MB 6MB 6MB
GPU Vega 8 @ 1100 MHz Vega eleven @ 1250 MHz Vega eight @ 1250 MHz Vega eleven @ 1400 MHz
TDP 65W 65W 65W 65W

For trying out this new APU we're using the MSI B450 Carbon Gaming with 16GB of DDR4-3200 memory. We won’t be masking the APU from every perspective like we did with the 2200G and 2400G as most of the records which includes reminiscence scaling remains applicable.

For now we want to see how unique the 3400G is to the 2400G, and what sort of cost proposition is on the table thinking about the Ryzen R5 3600 starts at simply $two hundred and there may be also the preceding-gen 1600 and 2600 elements which may be determined for even much less -- sans graphics, of path.

Application Benchmarks

The Cinebench R20 multi-middle check suggests the 3400G offering an 9% performance uplift from the 2400G version, in large part due to that 8% boom in clock pace, and partly due to the advanced IPC of Zen+. It’s worth noting that the R5 3600 is eighty one% faster on this test while handiest costing 33% greater, though it does lack integrated photos. We’ll speak greater approximately that later.

We see a ~10% development in unmarried core overall performance thanks to the frequency increase and improve to Zen+. This located the 3400G on par with the R5 2600X and this time the R5 3600 turned into just 15% faster because it’s not able to positioned the ones extra cores to paintings on this take a look at.

Memory bandwidth performance is plenty the identical, Zen+ improves reminiscence latency however as you may see in phrases of bandwidth each sustained a transfer pace of 36 GB/s.

The 3400G become 10% quicker than the 2400G in the 7-Zip compression take a look at and while that’s a first rate little bump a Box global where 6-middle processors are now common it doesn’t appearance that fantastic.

AMD’s SMT implementation is very green when it comes to decompression paintings in 7-zip. As a end result the 3400G beats the i7 -7700K and wasn’t a great deal slower than the 6-core/6-thread 9600K.

We’ve tested Premiere the usage of configurations: one with the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, the same old photos card used for trying out CPUs, and then one the usage of the intergrtated Vega 11 pics for GPU acceleration.

With a fantastically succesful discrete pictures card the 3400G is genuinely very incredible on this take a look at, finishing the render in just 629 seconds. However, with out a pictures card it took 1762 seconds and that’s now not so terrific, in case you were going to use this processor for video modifying and encoding, buying an entry-stage portraits card will be the manner to move, or higher yet simply purchase the R5 3600 and pair that with an access-degree photos card.

The 3400G changed into only 4% quicker than the 2400G in the Corona benchmark and at the same time as that made each tons faster than the Core i5-7600K, they were slower than the whole thing else.

Similar margins are seen within the Blender Open Data benchmark, this time the 3400G presented a 6% performance improve over the 2400G and both trailed the 7700K.

Power Consumption

When it involves energy consumption the 3400G nonetheless sips energy, pushing total consumption 10% higher than that of the 2400G and that intended gadget usage changed into 10% lower than what we noticed with the 7600K.

Moving on to operating temperatures we see that the 3400G peaked at fifty eight ranges the usage of the Wraith Spire field cooler while running the Blender take a look at. Out of the container it sustained an running frequency of 3950 MHz and when enabling PBO + AutoOC inside the Ryzen Master software program that didn’t alternate.

When checking out with F1 2019 the 3400G ran a good deal cooler notwithstanding the Vega 11 photos now being in use, right here the CPU peaked at simply forty five stages and ran at 4025 MHz. Enabling PBO + AutoOC pushed the working temperature up to forty eight stages and this time we did get a 100 MHz bump to the working frequency.

Gaming Benchmarks (with upload-in GeForce GPU)

Before trying out the integrated GPU, permit’s take a brief examine how the 3400G stacks as much as other CPUs whilst evaluating gaming overall performance with out a GPU quandary.

At 1080p it’s quicker than the Core i5-7600K and not a top notch deal slower than the 6-center/12-thread R5 1600, moreover it supplied an 11% increase over the 2400G. The 3400G is even greater competitive at 1440p, situating itself among the R5 1600 and 1600X, no longer horrific for budget processor.

Performance in Battlefield V was first rate. For example, the 3400G mimicked the 1% low performance of the Core-7700K whilst the average become only slightly down on the R5 1600. This time the 3400G become up to 10% faster than the 2400G.

We see something comparable in Far Cry New Dawn, no matter the CPU aspect of the 3400G being lots more punchy in this identify, the Vega eleven overclock doesn’t help here.

Next to no distinction is visible in Strange Brigade, the 3400G furnished a few extra frames however that became it.

Same is going for F1 2019. The 3400G is handiest precise for a few more frames, however the sport become playable even at 1080p.

World of Tanks sees a 14% performance development when upgrading to the 3400G. This is a name that blessings from the Zen+ upgrades however isn’t closely GPU bound while using the included photos, so it’s an extraordinary state of affairs in which the progressed CPU performance can be utilized in-sport with the Vega 11 pictures.

Who Is It For?

When AMD released the first Zen-based totally APUs in February of remaining yr it become an thrilling time for those merchandise to hit cabinets. At the time pix card pricing turned into heavily inflated because of mining call for, even if you have been prepared to spend 3 or 4 instances greater than you ought to, shelves have been empty to get you a brand new GPU.

The 2400G and 2200G gave gamers a Chip: budget an alternative. The APUs would can help you play games, albeit with low exceptional visuals, however they gave you the capacity to play and then upgrade to a discrete photographs card later. Today although, we haven't any such problem. The 2nd-hand pics card market is thriving and you could purchase a new Radeon RX 570 for as low as $one hundred thirty and so as to permit a massively advanced gaming experience. It’s like evaluating chalk and cheese.

The Ryzen 3400G will set you lower back $149, meaning the APU choice remains distinctly cheap for the ones buying new hardware, but we sense in nowadays’s promote it could be relegated to be a spot product.

If your number one interest is gaming, a Ryzen three 1200 for $sixty five new with an RX 570 for $one hundred thirty or a 2nd-hand model for $60, might be a extensively higher gaming blend. Comparing to 'new' pricing, for just 30% greater you’ll see over two hundred% extra performance. But in case you’re willing to save used on the portraits card, the combo can be less expensive than just shopping for the 3400G.

For heavy productivity work, the 3400G isn’t a cost powerful choice either. Instead you’re better off with the 5 2500U 1600 for $one hundred and five and pair it with a dust-cheap discrete graphics card. You’ll be able to get something with the $forty five leftover.

If all you want is a simple PC for workplace-kind paintings, then the 3400G is suitable. Likewise, in case you’re constructing a compact domestic theater PC and gaming isn’t the point of interest, the 3400G is a absolutely great option, too. Beyond that, you’re higher off with different options as we simply noted. The preceding-gen 2400G also can be had for $100 right now and considering the the 3400G changed into in no way 50% faster, we’d likely simply get the 2400G and pocket the extra money, shop that for a higher graphics card inside the future if gaming is at all to your plans.

  • 2500U Review five 3400G on Amazon, Google Express
  • five 1600 5 3600 on Amazon, Google Express
  • 1600 (B350) 5 3600X on Amazon, Google Express
  • Intel Core i5-9400F on Amazon, Google Express
  • (B350) five 2600X on Amazon, Google Express
  • GeForce RTX 2060 Super on Amazon, Google Express
  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on Amazon, Google Express